Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Adult Education Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ottoson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

After the Applause: Exploring Multiple Influences on Application Following an Adult Education Program

Judith M. Ottoson

Department of Educational Studies, the University of British Columbia.

This study explores barriers and facilitators to the application of learning following a continuing education program. Telephone interviews were conducted with 27 multidisciplinary participants four months after a five-day Institute. The interviews sought to assess whether and how participants had applied a health education planning and evaluation model taught during the Institute. A model, the Application Process Framework, guided interviews and data analysis in five areas of potential influence on application: educational program, innovation to be applied, predisposition of the learner, enabling skills of the learner and characteristics of the context of application, and social support. Although respondents primarily looked to the context to explain whether and how application occurred, the conceptual framework helped illuminate other influences, most notably, respondent predisposition. Implications for adult education practice and research are discussed.

Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 2, 92-107 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/074171369704700203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
F. D. Butterfoss
The Coalition Technical Assistance and Training Framework: Helping Community Coalitions Help Themselves
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2004; 5(2): 118 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
E. C. Paluck, L. W. Green, C. J. Frankish, D. W. Fielding, and B. Haverkamp
Assessment of Communication Barriers in Community Pharmacies
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2003; 26(4): 380 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. A. MacDonald and L. W. Green
Reconciling Concept and Context: The Dilemma of Implementation in School-Based Health Promotion
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2001; 28(6): 749 - 768.
[Abstract] [PDF]