This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cutz, G. Articles by Chandler, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Emic-Etic Conflicts as Explanation of Nonparticipation in Adult Education among the Maya of Western Guatemala

Ball State University, OOgrcutzsaq{at}bsu.edu

Paul Chandler

Ball State University

A 1996-1997 field study of reasons for nonparticipation in literacy programs among illiterate Mayan adults in rural western Guatemala demonstrated an emic-etic distinction within adult education. This distinction may be the critical determinant of success or failure of adult education efforts and can also explain gaps between theory, research, and the practice of adult education. Literacy programs have aimed to convert illiterate adults into literates. However, emic concepts held by illiterate adults in this study have made these attempts fail and deterred illiterate adults from participation in literacy programs. These concepts are generated and supported at four structural levels: individual-4a) literacy is not work and (b) the concept of schooling; family-(a) family obligations and moral values and (b) humiliation of the adult male; community-(a) the concept of Maya and (b) moral economy; national-4a) loss of cultural identity, (b) indigenous community, and (c) irrelevance of literacy.

Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 1, 64-75 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/07417130022087125


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?