This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Conceição, S. C. O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Faculty Lived Experiences in the Online Environment

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

This phenomenological study investigated the meaning of the online teaching experience of college faculty when there was an absence of physical presence. Findings show that the online experience brings new dimensions to the teaching practice when there is an absence of physical presence: (a) The length and depth of engagement during the delivery of the course differs from face-to-face teaching and (b) the experience is rewarding in new ways. Practical implications are suggested for adult education related to teaching improvement and instructional design.

Key Words: online teaching • distance education • faculty lived experiences

References

• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm
• Annand, D., & Haughey, M. (1997). Instructors’ orientations toward computer-mediated learning environments. Journal of Distance Education, 12(1-2), 127-152.
• Baldwin, R. G. (1998). Technology’s impact on faculty life and work. In K. H. Gillespie (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: Vol. 76. The impact of technology on faculty development, life, and work (pp. 7-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Beaudoin, M. F. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 21-29.
• Becker, C. S. (1992). Living and relating: An introduction to phenomenology. London: Sage.
• Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (1997). Moving to FE: The voice of the learner. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 494)
• Bower, B. (2001). Distance education: Facing the faculty challenge. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2). Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/summer42/bower42.html
• Cohen, M. S., & Ellis, T. J. (2002, November 6-9). Developing criteria set for an online learning environment. Proceedings of 32nd American Society for Engineering Education/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2002: Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston.
• Conceição-Runlee, S., & Reilly, K. (1999, October). Experiences of faculty members who interact with students in an online environment. Paper presented at the Midwest Research to Practice Conference, University of Missouri-St. Louis.
• Coppola, D. (1983). Phenomenological research with children: Guidelines to follow and implications for the practitioner. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 237 228)
• Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. (2002, Spring). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169-189.
• Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). A lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 303-317.
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• DeSieno, R. (1995). Netlaw: The faculty and digital technology. Educom Review, 30(4), 46-48.
• DiBiase, D. (2000). Is distance teaching more work or less work? The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 6-20.
• Diekelmann, N., Schuster, R., & Nosek, C. (2000, June). Creating new pedagogies at the millennium: The common experiences of University of Wisconsin-Madison teachers using distance education technologies. Distance Education System wide Interactive Electronic Newsletter, 5.7. Retrieved from http://www.uwsa.edu/olit/ttt/98.pdf
• Eastmond, D. V. (1998). Adult learners and Internet-based distance education. In B. Cahoon (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education: Vol. 78. Adult learning and the Internet (pp. 33-41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Easton, S. S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52(2).
• Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235-260.
• Green, K. C. (1996). The coming ubiquity of information technology. Change, 18(2), 24-28.
• Green, K. C. (1997). The 1997 National Survey of Information Technology in Higher Education. Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/1997/index.html
• Hislop, G. H., & Ellis, H. J. C. (2004). A study of faculty effort in online teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 15-31.[CrossRef]
• Kosak, L., Manning, D., Dobson, E.Rogerson, L., Cotnam, S., Colaric, S., et al. (2004). Prepared to teach online? Perspectives of faculty in the University of North Carolina System. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(3). Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/fall73/kosak73.html
• Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• McDonald, J., & Postle, G. (1999, March 3). Teaching online: Challenge to a reinterpretation of traditional instructional models. Paper presented at the Fifth Australian World Wide Web Conference, Southern Cross University, Australia. Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.usq.edu.au/users/mcdonalj/papers/paper.htm
• McKenzie, B., Mims, N., Bennett, E., & Waugh, M. (2000). Needs, concerns and practices of online instructors. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(3). Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/fall33/mckenzie33.html
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage.
• Pachnowski, L., & Jurczyk, J. (2003). Perceptions of faculty on the effect of distance learning technology on faculty preparation time. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(3). Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/fall63/pachnowski64.html
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage.
• Sellani, R., & Harrington, W. (2002). Addressing administrator/faculty conflict in an academic online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 131-145.[CrossRef]
• Visser, J. A. (2000). Faculty work in developing and teaching Web-based distance courses: A case study of time and effort. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 21-32.
• Young, J. R. (2002, May 31). The 24-hour professor: Online teaching redefines faculty members’ schedules, duties, and relationships with students. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A31-A33.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Conceição, S. C. O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?